imaginair.es fait partie du réseau social décentralisé propulsé par Mastodon.
Une instance mastodon pour les créateur·ices et passionné·e·s d'imaginaire(s)

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

68
comptes actifs

En savoir plus

Allan Haverholm

@abolisyonista @academicchatter If deadnames can be considered equivalent to pseudonyms, maybe this can be of value: citethisforme.com/citation-gen

It suggests putting the author name stated in the publication first because that's what others need to retrieve the source, and giving the author's "real" name (which I would compare to their lived name) in brackets.

I know this is the opposite of where you landed, and I understand the reasoning for emphasising an author's lived name over their given name. In some respects, lived names could also be considered pseudonymous in that they are assumed — although not for the same reasons.

This is not a simple matter, but until there is a clear citation style guide on the subject I would use the published name first with the lived name in brackets for clarification, only to simplify the retrieval of cited sources.

Cite this for Me | Free Reference Generator – Harvard, APA, MLA, Chicago...Citing a Pseudonym | Cite This For MeDo you know how to cite a pseudonym, or pen name? Not to worry, our post will explain the basic guidelines and show you how to cite them in MLA and APA.